Ruto's Govt to Establish a "Social Media" Police Unit Before 2027

President William Ruto’s administration has unveiled plans to establish a specialised digital intelligence unit as part of broader efforts to curb the misuse of the internet, a move that has immediately ignited debate over privacy, surveillance, and constitutional freedoms.

The proposal, contained in the latest annual report on national security presented to Parliament, signals a significant shift in how the state intends to monitor and respond to online activity.

While the government frames the initiative as a necessary response to emerging security threats, critics warn it could open the door to intrusive state surveillance.

According to the report, the government is also working on a legal and operational framework for digital policing, including rapid reaction protocols designed to respond swiftly to online-driven incidents.

The document argues that digital platforms have increasingly become tools for coordination and mobilisation during periods of unrest, raising concerns within security agencies.

“Going forward, the government intends to enhance law enforcement efforts by introducing suburb-level patrols, establishing a dedicated digital intelligence unit and rapid response protocols, as well as developing legal frameworks for digital policing,” the report tabled by Ruto stated.

Also Read:Court Issues Way Forward for the Cybercrime Amendment Act

Claims of Online Abuse and Protest Mobilisation

The security report, which covers the period between September 1, 2024, and August 2025, claims that demonstrators relied heavily on social media and mainstream media to organise protests.

Platforms largely owned by foreign companies have been exploited to spread hate speech, propaganda, and misinformation, amplifying tensions and undermining public order.

The proposed digital intelligence unit will focus on monitoring harmful online activity rather than private conversations.

Concerns over state overreach are heightened by Kenya’s recent legislative history, particularly regarding laws that regulate online speech and cyber activity.

However, civil liberties groups and digital rights advocates remain unconvinced, warning that vague mandates could easily be abused.

“The government cannot claim to promote democracy while passing laws that silence criticism,” the KHRC stated in a past address.

Also Read: Ruto Explains Why He Signed Cybercrimes Law on the Day of Raila’s Death

Cybercrime Law Court Battle

The push for enhanced digital policing comes against the backdrop of a major legal setback for the government.

The High Court recently suspended the enforcement of key provisions of the Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes (Amendment) Act, 2025, after a petition challenged their constitutionality.

Justice Lawrence Mugambi issued conservatory orders halting Sections 27(1)(b), (c), and (2) of the law, pending the hearing of a case filed by politician Reuben Kigame and the Kenya Human Rights Commission (KHRC).

“A conservatory order is hereby issued suspending the enforcement, implementation and operation of Section 27(1)(b), (c), and (2) of the Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes (Amendment) Act, 2025,” Justice Mugambi ruled.

Petitioners argue that the amendments threaten freedom of expression, privacy, and media independence, with Kigame warning that “the law risks turning Kenya into a surveillance state.”

The KHRC has similarly cautioned that the provisions could be used to, “silence dissent and criminalise legitimate online discourse.”

Follow our WhatsApp Channel and WhatsApp Community for instant news updates